Social Contract in MENAAP#

According to the Michael, et, al., 2021 report, there are three aggregate indices to measure the social contract

  1. The Citizen-State Bargain also referred to as ‘Civil Capacity’

    • Civil Capacity: Citizen Organization, Citizen Mobilization, Citizen Cooperation

    • State Capacity: State Authority, State Resources, State Efficiency

  2. Social Outcomes that form the contents of the social contract

    • Thickness: Public Goods, Social Safety Nets

    • Inclusiveness: Equal Opportunity, Absence of Corruption

    • Responsiveness: Human Right, Freedom of Expression

  3. Resilience and Dynamism

    • Alignment: Civil Compliance, Popular Support

Social Contract Indicators Definitions#

Indicator Code

Indicator Name

Definition

Civil_Capacity

Civil Capacity

The level of voice and collective action capabilities that average citizens have to hold the State accountable and influence public policy.

Absence_Capture

Lack of elite capture

The level to which bargaining power within the social contract is evenly distributed and not overly concentrated in a narrow group of elites. The extent to which abuse of power is prosecuted.

Absence_Exclusion

Lack of exclusion

The extent to which there is no marginalization and exclusion of groups based on economic or socio-demographic dimensions where they would be excluded from participating in the social contract.

Social_Capital

Social capital

The extent to which citizens are knowledgeable about major policy debates and engage in policy discussions among themselves. The amount of interpersonal trust and social cohesion enabling for collective action among groups.

Quality_Interface

Quality of the Citizen-State Interface

The quality and openness of the channels of communications and exchange between citizens and the State.

Intermediary_Channels

Institutional channels

Presence of formal access of information institutions (such as open budgeting and open contracting), free and fair elections, and state-led citizen engagement initiatives to consult with citizens.

Institutional_Channels

Institutional channels

Presence of formal access of information institutions (such as open budgeting and open contracting), free and fair elections, and state-led citizen engagement initiatives to consult with citizens.

Public_Channels

Public channels

The levels of freedom of expression and of the press that allow for opinions to be shared widely and openly and for public opinion to circulate freely. And freedom of people to assemble into groups to demonstrate.

Resilience

Resilience

The extent to which there is evidence of a misalignment between citizens’ expectations and their perceptions of the outcomes from the social contract, and that there is a way forward for the resolution of these misalignments through peaceful dialogue.

Mass Mobilization

Social Unrest

The level of presence of mass mobilizations such as protests and demonstrations.

Trust

Trust in the national government

The self-reported level of trust from citizens in their national government.

Civic_Space

Perceptions on the quality of the civic space

To what extent are citizens reporting positive perceptions on their freedom of expression, the fairness of elections, and their capacity to voice their opinion to public officials.

The autoreload extension is already loaded. To reload it, use:
  %reload_ext autoreload
../_images/20ff2167c98384d3ee657748b7a3c6ab45ebe5f48b9222876c1b22f420f03d99.png
../_images/ddbf9254c4f610e9105bad16a766bb58fcd059e0d5ffd7eb93844cc8bebe50cc.png
../_images/41b71dd1e88a9ad24f816e71a64abb80792222783ec1c851ae87d9f889593835.png
../_images/eb47863445572b7b35ed0f7c6c5f0e057451b43f669223bf219632d70f3e828c.png
../_images/e55b7590325fdd192ab4a30f73cc183ab4659dc982bc910ef595ac2e791ba917.png
../_images/25c324b9f29545e00988e8084199d5050e2d2ece6f5980b7a68cbdb43042aa87.png
../_images/73121e458940e636b568f0fed4030f57cd39363b1477f7a63ccbac9d095641fb.png

Mass Mobilization compared with data from ACLED#

../_images/f0d952be5b804e5e72bfafae912a5bc2e1b82735724e86d8bb786082815cb495.png

Change in Civil Capacity and Mass Mobilization#

Methodology: Calculating Percentage Change with Minimum Data Requirements#

Our analysis calculates percentage changes in social contract indicators using a robust methodology that ensures statistical reliability:

Data Quality Threshold#

  • Minimum 10 data points: Only countries with ≥10 non-null observations per indicator are included

  • This threshold ensures we have sufficient temporal coverage to calculate meaningful trends

  • Eliminates countries with sparse or insufficient data that could produce misleading results

Calculation Method#

  1. Data Preparation: Filter out null/missing values for each country-indicator pair

  2. Quality Check: Verify country has minimum required observations (default: 10 points)

  3. Temporal Sorting: Arrange data chronologically to identify earliest and latest years

  4. Change Calculation:

    Percentage Change = ((Latest Value - Earliest Value) / |Earliest Value|) × 100
    
  5. Transparency: Include start and end years for each calculation to enable verification

Social Contract Indicators: Percentage Change (2005-2023)
Analysis includes countries with at least 10 years of data available
Civil Capacity data unavailable for: Djibouti, Gaza, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, West Bank
Country Civil Capacity (%) Mass Mobilization (%)
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan -28.7% 31.1%
Morocco -336.0% 570.6%
Libya -56.5% 229.1%
Iran -191.7% 200.8%
Syria -66.9% 191.3%
Tunisia 576.9% 171.0%
Djibouti nan% 73.7%
Pakistan -55.3% 60.6%
Yemen -86.5% 47.5%
Jordan -20.3% 37.2%
Qatar nan% 17.8%
United Arab Emirates 85.2% 11.4%
Saudi Arabia 10.1% -19.3%
Oman nan% -19.7%
Iraq 59.4% -25.0%
West Bank nan% -60.1%
Lebanon -157.6% -86.1%
Gaza nan% -114.4%
Bahrain -250.1% -139.0%
Egypt 1.4% -162.4%
Algeria 149.4% -242.4%
Kuwait nan% -725.0%
Afghanistan -342.9% -1371.0%